What?!  You really believe that NOBODY should EVER be banned?

Zoe

 Karl Eichwalder <ke@gnu.franken.de> wrote:

Jimmy Wales writes:

> Since this would be a system-wide change, not English-only, we should
> discuss it over here, too.

You will not solve a single "problem" by banning. All these problems
are communication problems or these involved parties are simply psycho
cases needing our support.

Thus, no banning actions, please.

> Disadvantages:
>
> * Like all banning mechanisms, it could be abused.
> * If the IP is shared by "innocent" parties, they also get blocked.

Yes, these are the side effects making bans even more eval.

--
ke@suse.de (work) / keichwa@gmx.net (home): |
http://www.gnu.franken.de/ke/ | ,__o
Free Translation Project: | _-\_<,
http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/contrib/po/HTML/ | (*)/'(*)
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l@wikipedia.org
http://www.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l



Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more