Also, the no.* subdomain is alive and kicking; I'm actually working on upgrading their taxobox to actually serve its implied purpose-- for whatever reason, it hasn't so far displayed any sort of taxonomy. But that's about to change. :)
Bob
On 4/1/2012 3:21 AM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
I've certainly made that mistake before! Although, 7 years late is impressive... Where did you find the email?
I'm curious now, does anyone know what ended up happening with the Norsk Wikipedias? On Apr 1, 2012 9:16 AM, "Gerard Meijssen"gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, It did not trigger me that it was that old. If I had I would not have answered it. Thanks, Gerard
On 1 April 2012 02:22, M. Williamsonnode.ue@gmail.com wrote:
Gerard, on my e-mail this shows as a reply to an e-mail thread from 2005. Was this your intention?
2012/3/21 Gerard Meijssengerard.meijssen@gmail.com
Hoi, There is a process for the start of new projects and for the start of
new
language versions. This is a formal process and it does not involve the voting of people. What it does involve is the existence of languages recognised in the ISO-639-3. As such Norwegian, or the no /nor code is considered a macro-language and does not qualify for a new project.
It is explicitly understood that by no.wikipedia.org we expect it to
be
Bokmal. Thanks, GerardM
http://translatewiki.net/wiki/Portal:No
2005/4/25 Bjarte Sørensenbjarte.sorensen@gmail.com
Dear all,
Most of you would be aware of some of the discussions that have
occurred
around Wikipedia in the Norwegian languages. Since the last round of discussions on this list, there has been a lot of internal debate, as well as what seems to be a fairly widely accepted agreement following voting.
This e-mail intends to, after a brief recap on Norwegian language and wikipedia issues, take those interested through the latest
development
and will stake out the road ahead. It is also intended to inform the international community about the current agreement on no.wikipedia,
so
as to prevent misunderstandings in the future.
Finally, we will mention an unfortunate reaction to the vote by a
small
number of users at the Norwegian Bokmål/Riksmål (no:) wikipedia who
want
to disregard the result of the voting and are planning to create a _third_ Norwegian wikipedia with the sole mission of mixing the
contents
of the two current Norwegian versions.
== A short language history of Norway ==
Spoken Norwegian ("norsk") (ISO 639-2 alpha-2 code "no") is in a
fairly
unique situation compared to most other languages of the world in
that
it has two widely accepted written standards, Bokmål (ISO 639-2
alpha-2
code "nb") and Nynorsk (ISO 639-2 alpha-2 code "nn"). By national legislation they are both regarded as official written forms of Norwegian. In addition, many people still make a distinction between Bokmål and its precursor which still is in use, Riksmål.
Briefly speaking, Bokmål and Riksmål are descendants of the Danish written language. Until the 1800s, Danish was the only widely used written language in Norway as a result of four centuries of union
with
Denmark. With increasing independence came a wish to norwegianise the Danish standard, with Knud Knudsen at the forefront for changing
parts
of the vocabulary and orthographics. Thus, Riksmål, and later Bokmål, resulted. These forms together are today probably used by about 90%
of
Norway's population, or somewhere around 3,500,000 people.
Parallel to this development, a new written standard was created by
Ivar
Aasen. He travelled extensively throughout Norway, and based his new language, landsmål, on the grammar and vocabulary of dialect samples from around the country. This was later renamed Nynorsk. Modern
Nynorsk
differs significantly from modern Bokmål, and may be linguistically looked upon as as different (or as similar if you like) as Swedish is
to
Danish. For English or Dutch/German speakers, the differences may be likened to those between (Lowland) Scots and English or Low German
and
Dutch. Today it is estimated that about 500,000-600,000 people have Nynorsk as their first written language.
More information about the Norwegian language history can be found in English, German, French, Spanish or Portuguese on the website of the Norwegian Language Council: http://www.sprakrad.no/templates/Page.aspx?id=653
== A short history of Wikipedia in Norwegian ==
The first Norwegian wikipedia started 26 November 2001 on the
subdomain
no.wikipedia.org. As most wikipedias, its contributor and article
count
started really picking up around the end of 2003. At the time, it accepted all written standards of Norwegian, although the amount of Nynorsk was minimal. There were already several debates about the feasibilty and appropriateness of keeping the two languages united on one Wikipedia. On 31 July 2004 a Wikipedia for Nynorsk was created.
The creation of nn:, however, split the community at no: wikipedia.
Many
felt that given that Nynorsk now had its own wikipedia, no: should become a Bokmål/Riksmål Wikipedia only. Others disapproved and
claimed
that there was no need to change and that it should continue its language policy of accepting all and keep its interwiki link name of "Norsk".
Nynorsk Wikipedia soon proved a success, as it within the next few months gathered several people who had felt uncomfortable in the (mainly) Bokmål environment at no:. The name displayed in interwiki links became "Norsk (nynorsk)" (languages are not spelt with upper
case
in Norwegian). To date it continues to be one of the fastest growing wikipedias, with a steady article increase, now at over 6000 articles and>50 editors with more than 10 edits since arrival.
== Votes ==
The issue of no:'s language policy has come up time and again, and a vote was held in March ([[:no:Wikipedia:Målform]]) as to which policy
to
adapt. Independent of the method of the tally (whether or not to
include
new contributors etc.) there was a majority for switching to a Bokmål/Riksmål only language policy (50% for Bokmål/Riksmål, 43.2%
for
Bokmål/Riksmål/Nynorsk/Høgnorsk, and 6.8% for the official variants Bokmål/Nynorsk only).
Following this result, there is now going to be a vote on which interwiki link name will most appropriately reflect the current
language
policy of no:. The result of this vote will most likely be either
"Norsk
(bokmål)" or "Norsk (bokmål/riksmål)".
Understandably, there has also been a debate as to whether the
subdomain
should change from "no" to "nb", as this is the correct
representation
of Bokmål according to ISO 639-2. However, there is some resentment towards such a move and currently a general acceptance in letting the Bokmål wikipedia stay at "no". The alternative some have suggested
is a
server-side redirect from "no" to "nb", in the same way that "nb"
today
is a server-side redirect to the equivalent page on "no".
== Summary of the problem ==
Unfortunately, a small group of users (who all write Bokmål/Riksmål)
are
ignoring the results from the vote, and are claiming they want to re-establish a wikipedia for all written standards of Norwegian. They claim they have been in touch with people centrally in Wikimedia (developers? stewards?) and that they have so far received positive comments. With this email, we would like to state the fact that there have been no official decisions about creating a third Norwegian wikipedia containing both Bokmål and Nynorsk, it is merely an
unofficial
initiative from a small group of users which started a sign-on list
at
[[:no:Bruker:Norsk_Wikipedia]]. A spontaneous list with signatures against this activity was immediately created at [[:no:Wikipedia-diskusjon:Fellesnorsk]]. The process of creating a
third
Norwegian wikipedia has not gone through a voting process in any of
the
two existing Norwegian wikipedias (no: and nn:) and can not be considered as a decision by the Norwegian Wikipedia community.
We believe the creation of a third wikipedia under the Wikimedia foundation would have a serious and unfortunate impact on the
existing
wikipedias in Norwegian, no: and nn:, and would undermine Wikipedia's reputation in Norway. This being said, we are all for extensive co- operation between the four Scandinavian language wikipedias
(including
Swedish and Danish), as evident by the recent creation of [[:meta:Skanwiki]], the Scandinavian meta-pages, and the use of
featured
articles from neighbour wikipedias.
== Conclusion ==
Hopefully, this letter will help people better understand the complicated language situation of the Norwegian Wikipedia community,
so
as to give a background on which discussion can take place on this
list
in the future, such as the inevitable debate following a possible request for a re-establishment of the common (and third!) Norwegian Wikipedia.
From the community of no.wikipedia.org and nn.wikipedia.org,
Bjarte Sørensen [[:meta:User:BjarteSorensen]]
(Administrator/bureaucrat
on
nn:) Lars Alvik [[:no:User:Profoss]] (Administrator/bureaucrat on no:) Øyvind A. Holm [[:no:User:Sunny256]] (Administrator on no:) Onar Vikingstad [[:no:User:Vikingstad]] (Administrator on no:) Jon Harald Søby [[:no:User:Jhs]] (Administrator on no:) Chris Nyborg [[:no:User:Cnyborg]] (Administrator on no:) Guttorm Flatabø [[:no:User:Dittaeva]] (Administrator on nn:) Gunleiv Hadland [[:meta:User:Gunnernett]] (Administrator on nn:) Jarle Fagerheim [[:nn:User:Jarle]] (Administrator on nn:) Øyvind Jo Heimdal Eik [[:en:User:Pladask]] (Administrator on nn: and
no:)
Kristian André Gallis [[:nn:User:Kristaga]] Vegard Wærp [[:no:User:Vegardw]] Nina Aldin Thune [[:no:User:Nina]] Thor-Rune Hansen [[:no:User:ThorRune]] Claes Tande [[:no:User:Ctande]] Arnt-Erik Krokaa [[:no:User:AEK]] Rune Sattler [[:no:User:Shauni]] _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l