A "score" for an article could be developed from number of edits, number of
users who have edited the article, and number of times a reader has looked
at the page.
Number of times someone has looked at the page tells you the number of times
anyone has had an opporunity to edit, number of edits and number of users
who have edited shows how much the article has been worked over.
Fred
From: Delirium <delirium(a)hackish.org>
Reply-To: wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 15:36:13 -0400
To: wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
Subject: [Wikipedia-l] some thoughts on peer-review and obscure subjects
So, as others have proposed, I do think we eventually need some sort of
tagging system, so people know whether a particular article is a
well-worked-over draft, or an initial draft that has undergone little to
no review.