Erik Moeller wrote:
I understand that you're disappointed that your
logo didn't win.
Oh, no! Don't make this about me! I took all possible precautions in all
my previous messages not to make it about you--as a matter of fact, not
to make it about anyone. Also, I made it clear in my first message on
this topic in the other thread this was not about my entry not winning.
And finally, you're not talking about my submission in your message,
mine was the Fibonacci spiral, which has never been mentioned today--I
hope that shows how much this is personal.
If I am disappointed at something apart from what our new logo looks
like, it's not that my logo didn't win, it's that even now I can't seem
to be able to discuss the issue with someone with a different
opinion--how you keep believing that actually worked during development
I can't really see. Can you really not see that the ultimate refinement
process, judging by what happened so far, would be to add centipedes,
neon lights, ants, a search button, lens flare, a kidney and a supernova
to the current proposal? Or if you see that, do you support it simply by
saying "For some people, it does [work this way]"?
Anyway, I'm talking about one thing, and I'm doing my best to discuss it
objectively, and you're talking about something else, and you take a
defensive attitude, while being subtly offensive on occasion. This is
leading nowhere, or if it leads somewhere we probably don't want to get
there. I will do my best to remain silent and accept the current decision.