In a message dated 1/28/2008 2:13:34 AM Eastern Standard Time,
On 28/01/2008, daniwo59(a)aol.com <daniwo59(a)aol.com> wrote:
That said, having looked at the current Hebrew
article, and being
with the most of the incidents, the article is highly
POV. That is to
may be sourced, but it is still POV. For any Israelis
reading this list,
and Ovadiah Yoseph made no less outrageous comments
in their time, but
articles seem to be far more balanced.
The current article also suffers from all the brouhaha around it. It
has been edited by several new accounts, which are most probably
operated by experienced users whose reaction to the situation is part
encyclopedic, part tongue-in-cheek. Certainly not the right way to
Yes, the article is POV and Yitzhak is known for 1) being litigious, and 2)
twisting facts. Rather than simply protecting it, the article should be
stubbed first--I doubt he would have a problem with the current English version
of the article at _http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amnon_Yitzhak_
) . For people who want some sense of who this
) . Right
now, the Hebrew version is essentially a two-line introduction,
followed by a list of all the controversial statements he made.
**************Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape.