On 29/09/2007, Ian Tresman <ian2(a)knowledge.co.uk> wrote:
Is there a policy requirement for editors and Admin to
substantiate their "opinions" against another editor (b) reply to
For example, if an Admin claims I am "pushing pseudoscience", is
there a requirement for them to provide actual examples of where I
might be doing this, and at the very least, reply to my requests to do so?
Editors, including admins, are almost all volunteers, so there are
very few requirements for them to do anything. People can claim
whatever they like, if they don't justify that claim, nothing is
likely to happen. If you are blocked on an unjustified claim, you can
appeal it by the normal means.