Mark Williamson wrote:
Are you referring specifically to this case?
If so, what other options are there? The way I see it, there are two
rigidly opposed options:
1) Cantonese Wikipedia;
2) No Cantonese Wikipedia.
I agree with you that these are fairly rigid alternatives.
So I don't see what was missed. I informed
Cantonese speakers, and the
international community. What's missing?
You did not inform Mandarin speakers. That's a pretty egregious error.
--Jimbo