Of course you don't. The fact that continue it is equally pitiful.
Please elaborate on your class-system idea of this list. I'm sure its very fascinating.
-S
On 3/9/07, Mark Williamson node.ue@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think it was inappropriate. That's what matters here - what I think, and what the list admins think.
Mark
On 09/03/07, Steve subsume@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm, sure. I also think administrative skepticism is > always < neccessary, regardless of the tally of charges. Demonization is always a very useful tool against people who have done something wrong, and is a very effective marginalizer.
Your initial smarmy, condescending rant was totally inappropriate, and I was glad that George Herbert followed it up with a measured description of the problem.
-S
On 3/9/07, Mark Williamson node.ue@gmail.com wrote:
It becomes an issue when somebody espouses racism in every post and uses it to personally attack others. "You guys won't listen to me because you must all be Koreans", for example.
Mark
On 08/03/07, Delirium delirium@hackish.org wrote:
Mark Williamson wrote:
Because you are a racist :-) You probably even deny the indigenous status of the Ainu.
I would hope that's not the reason... if we were to block people for holding objectionable opinions (even exceedingly objectionable ones), I could submit a very long list of names of people to be blocked, including many admins!
-Mark
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
-- Refije dirije lanmè yo paske nou posede pwòp bato.
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
-- Refije dirije lanmè yo paske nou posede pwòp bato.
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l