On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:12 PM, David Gerard
That's what the IWF's been consistently
asserting to the press, that's
what their rep said on Radio 4 Today when I was on and that's what
many journalists have said to me that the IWF said to them. Given
this, I feel confident in stating that the IWF really believe that
they are required to block the page the image is on.
Do they believe it is a technical limitation (it's not, if they think
this we need to educate them harder) or that its their purpose?
I'm sure the organization consists of people with a whole spectrum of
Why doesn't Wikipedia provide a page without the image on it, so that it
doesn't get blocked? A little too hard-headed, maybe?