Some people consistently move passages (usually the entire article) of copyright violations to Talk pages. Talks may not necessarily be considered Wikipedia proper. But they are still integral part of Wikipedia operations nevertheless.
This such behaviour acceptable?
I think such people think the violated passage is still useful information that can be consulted later. But I mean, if you want to see the violation, go check out the history, or if the warning still presents, the source website.
Or is Talks actually legally not a part of Wikipedia and so we are not responsible if there's unlawful matters or craps on it?
Menchi Zh-En
_________________________________________________________________ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail