You also fail to mention all the articles with traditional titles that
are only redirects to the simplified versions, the articles with
traditional titles but body text partially or fully in simplified,
In my experience writing the articles for zh-tw:, maybe 1 for every 10
of the articles had a traditional version that wasn't extremely messed
up in one of those ways.
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 06:25:10 +0000 (UTC), shizhao <shizhao(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Mark Williamson <node.ue@...> writes:
Sorry everybody, I'd like to apologise for being so... well, so... agressive.
I hope you can understand why I might find it hard now to keep my
cool: over 600 articles I am almost singlehandedly responsible for are
to be deleted, I have been told to copy-and-paste them but come on,
this is 600 ARTICLES we're talking about. Also, I did not even know
this was going on until I tried to go to wantedpages on zh-tw: and
found that I was redirected to wantedpages at zh:, and then asked in
#wikipedia and was told to check the ML to which I am not subscribed
(even if I were, I don't check my inbox on even a daily basis
plese see http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:%E7%B9%81%E7%AE%80%E4%BD%93%
E9%97%AE%E9%A2%98 [[Wikipedia:繁简体问题]] and talk.
My stat, now zh: Comparison that ascends the simplified Chinese and
traditional Chinese about is 4:1, is not say by you so little.Moreover,
someone already in the http:// fengzz.net/
wiki/ up start the trial of the
conversion between traditional Chinese and the arrows body.
Wikipedia-l mailing list