On 6/27/05, Angela <beesley(a)gmail.com> wrote:
If we
must choose between a work with free licensing and one made by a
wikipedian we should always replace the free work with the wikipedians
Why would the work by Wikipedians not also be a free work? People
should not be uploading non-free images, so this choice should not
have to be made.
My language didn't make my intent clear: I meant the choice between
work by a wikipedian (obviously free) and work found on the internet
that we believed to be free but was not made by a wikipedian.
Because work made by wikipedians is always free without any room for
doubt and because it's usually better matched for our needs, we should
prefer it.