It's not being dismissive. It's great if folks
have the critical mass
to start a new Wikipedia, and that's why there's been discussion about
defining a "starting set" of articles, front page, initial
contributors, etc. However, Mark has an exuberance in starting new
language Wikipedias, often without any prospect of sustainability.
1)
http://scn.wikipedia.org/ - created October 2004, well-maintained
by a number of regular contributors with now nearly 300 articles.
2)
http://fur.wikipedia.org/ - created 25 January 2005, currently has
5 articles and appears to be doing good rather than bad so far.
3)
http://sc.wikipedia.org/ - created a very long time ago, when I was
still new to Wikipedia. No regular contributors, 3 articles. The
difference between the other two is that for them, support came before
creation rather than after.
Mark.
(of all those other Wikipedias I have supported creating which were
eventually created, ang: is doing well, got: is not, and tum: appears
to be a bit stale though this had no opposition from anybody)