1) I don't call people I disagree with barking mad, unless they really
are barking mad. I believe this is the first time in a few months I've
called anyone barking mad, and in the intervening time there have been
plenty of people with whom I've had disagreements. I think most people
on this list would agree that Mr Jack and Naree is "barking mad".
2) Yes, but how many of them? I never said with absolute certainty
that all of those were BS examples, only that much of the list was BS.
None of the examples which I made it clear I was fairly certain were
universal were objected to, and even many of the ones which were
objected to proved a point, for example "autumn" vs "fall":
there's
one variant that's understood in both places, and another that is only
understood in one. Which one should be chosen?
3) Mr. Jack & Naree's most recent message is a bit daft ("looks like
he failed"). If he had the sense to check, he would see that that
message was not, in fact, a response to his "troll test" e-mail but
rather to his earlier e-mail which was written in all-caps. And, if it
takes two to troll, why is just about everybody else on this list
calling him a troll? Does that mean that they're all trolls too? And,
of course, this isn't a response to him, but a note to you which is
related to but not in response to his message. And if anyone so
wishes, I invite them to inform Mr Macdaddy that the troll test, from
now on, applies to him as well: if he IS a troll, he'll make another
post to this or related threads; if he ISN'T a troll, he won't.
Mark
On 23/09/05, Rowan Collins <rowan.collins(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 23/09/05, Mark Williamson <node.ue(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Arguing and trolling is one thing, but writing a
response in all-caps
is another.
Yes, so much worse than calling somebody you don't agree with "barking
mad", only to find that the examples you are objecting to are verified
by a number of other users. Hm...
--
Rowan Collins BSc
[IMSoP]
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
--
SI HOC LEGERE SCIS NIMIVM ERVDITIONIS HABES
QVANTVM MATERIAE MATERIETVR MARMOTA MONAX SI MARMOTA MONAX MATERIAM
POSSIT MATERIARI
ESTNE VOLVMEN IN TOGA AN SOLVM TIBI LIBET ME VIDERE