erik_moeller(a)gmx.de (Erik Moeller) writes:
At the Merz Akademie in Stuttgart I did a direct
comparison with
Britannica on some key subjects, and Wikipedia clearly came out on top in
many areas.
Maybe that's valid for the english version. Concerning the German
version we are facing many a lot gaps and semi-info.
If you're going to do a comprehensive paper,
that's the direction I
would pursue.
Please talk about the problematic areas, too. Often (I'm talking about
the German version) articles are just listings and another problem is,
that many a lot home land lovers (Heimatliebhaber) are active - thus
most of the time you will read only good things within their articles
and worse, they don'e hesitate to manipulate history.
Articles like "Böhmen" are always in danger.
--
| ,__o
| _-\_<,
http://www.gnu.franken.de/ke/ | (*)/'(*)