--- Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:
I won't vote because I am not part of that
community, but the recent
changes does show that the project is active. Assuming that the vote
succeeds there would still be enough active and involved people to pass
the criteria for starting a new wiki. Under those circumstances
wouldn't it be much easier to argue that a dissolution vote is invalid
if it would leave enough people behind to start a new wiki in that same
language.
Having an active community is NOT the most important reason to have a separate wiki. FAR
more
important, given our goal to having encyclopedias that everybody on the planet can read,
is to
make sure we consider how closely the proposed wiki's language is to other languages
we already
have wikis for.
It is my understanding that Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian are mutually intelligible
dialects of
Serbo-Croatian and that the bigest difference is the use of scripts between and/or among
them
(which MediaWiki can deal with on the same wiki without forking articles).
In fact, our article on this confirms my suspicion:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differences_in_standard_Serbian%2C_Croatian_an…
So a far, far better question is this: Why do we have separate Bosnian, Croatian and
Serbian
Wikipedias instead of just one Serbo-Croatian Wikipedia?
Splitting things up purely for purely political reasons is a grave, let me repeat, GRAVE,
violation of NPOV and does not serve our goal to provide an encyclopedia that the peoples
of the
Former Yugoslavia can use and understand.
We need to create a clear policy on the creation and shutdown of Wikipedias and apply
that
retroactively to fix this and other similarly horrid mistakes.
-- mav
__________________________________________
Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.
dsl.yahoo.com