Your claims that the abusive destruction of copyleft
by the Wikidata
project have nothing to do with copyright and nothing to do with Wikidata
don't make any sense.
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:00 AM, Gerard Meijssen <
gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hoi,
That is one argument that has nothing to do with copyright. Google may use
our content as long as it complies with the license. In addition to this,
our aim is to share in the sum of all knowledge. Arguably when Google pays
for the distribution, it saves us money.. Your logic has us pay Google for
helping us achieve our aims.
In addition, this has nothing to do with Wikidata.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 18 June 2018 at 15:18, The Cunctator <cunctator(a)gmail.com> wrote:
It looks from that discussion that the violations
of cc-by-sa in order
to
help google's profits have not been in any
way resolved.
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018, 1:56 AM Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemowiki(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Ave Cunctator.
>
> The Cunctator, 18/06/2018 04:46:
> > If it's pulling from Wikipedia (CC-BY-SA)
>
> It's not, in the sense that it's not getting any copyrightable bits
from
it.
A relevant document is
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikilegal/Database_Rights>.
Then just few days ago there was an exhausting discussion in various
mailing lists and <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T193728>.
Federico
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l