So, do you consider Belgradian to be your mother tongue? I, for one, think you're blowing smoke and disrupting WP to prove a point.
No, if it is possible to have "regional languages", I said that I have the same feelings for my regions as Zlatiborians for their.
I don't care about your feelings vs. their feelings. I will ask you again: Do you consider Belgradian to be your mother tongue?
There is more chance to have the person like that then person from Zlatibor. There are much more computers in San Francisco then in Zlatibor. If Wikipedia's official policy is to have "regional templates", I am sure that a lot of people would like to have their "regional language templates".
I don't advocate a policy of _having_ such templates, but rather of _allowing_ them when people who plan to actually use them want to create them. In your case, it seems more like you're wanting to disrupt WP to make a point, rather than that you actually feel like Belgradian is your mother tongue.
Wikipedia is about consensus, not "majority rules".
You have strong principles. The same one you are using about one more Chinese Wikipedia as you are using for the Zlatibor language template.
What? I didn't say anything about having another Chinese WP. Yes, I advocate for Cantonese and Wu WPs, but contrary to what you may think these aren't "one more Chinese Wikipedia".
Now, what I assume here is that you're trying to tell me that my belief is in a "majority rules" policy and that I should apply it everywhere.
Quite the contrary, I still believe in consensus. However, assuming good faith, I have not contested the 3 or so votes against a Cantonese WP that are either unsigned or signed by an anonymous user, as well as those by users who appear to be likely sockpuppets. I have not insisted that every voter verify their identity.
Also, the difference between a straight-out vote and a straw poll whose goal is to achieve consensus is that a straight-out vote doesn't nessecarily include elaboration on the opinions of the voters, just a simple "aye" or "nay". Nobody has insisted that all the Sinitic-wp voters on Meta all elaborate on their positions. Many have simply voted support or oppose with no explanation.
On the other hand, on the template-deletion page, people have expressed more detailed opinions which, although diametrically opposed, could probably find some sort of compromise in between.
And I should also add that Meta and individual Wikipedias are very different sites with very different rules -- many of the articles at Meta would be speedied if they were posted to en.wiki.
Mark