On Sep 30, 2004, at 3:49 PM, Delirium wrote:
This
case is covered in the style manual, which recommends the "with
comma" version for exactly that reason, at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_style#Commas
(FWIW, the punctuation section I couldn't remember the reference to is
on that page as well, at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_style#Punctuation)
The current style suggestions seem mostly reasonable to me. Certainly
better than a bunch of weird wikimarkup to try to accomodate all
variants.
-Mark
I agree, the mark up idea looks like a problem in search of a problem.