On 21/05/06, Eugene Zelenko eugene.zelenko@gmail.com wrote: ...
Why do you think that your opinion is only neutral one? There are
... Because it wasn't even disputed -- disputed as in "advancing arguments and proving the point". Assertion (e.g., that my opinion "isn't neutral") isn't really discussion.
Same matter with other points I've made. ...
Sorry, but I think discussion was in good faith. May be result are not are same as you wanted, but it's how compromise could be reached. We are still open for discussion.
My proposals didn't mean to get me "what I wanted". My proposals were meant to achieve some sort of consensus -- meaning *acceptable* for all concerned -- in Be: WP community.
Once again -- I wouldn't *like* the rules amended in my way, but they would be *acceptable*.
And yes, I do not believe in "good faith" of your fraction any more. (Just look at what your pal Kiryl writes here or what your pals wrote in Pravapis:Talk -- those people seem to be genuinely *pleased* with demise of "official Belarusian" community?!!)
Sorry everybody, I just couldn't let this fly.
-regards