Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote:
That's idiotic. What for is a ban where one can
"unban oneself" ?
For nothing, obviously. So why are we worrying about it?
What would be, if not idiotic, then at any rate a waste of effort,
would be to alter the natural code for blocking user names
so that it checks that whether the user names are admins first.
You make a fair case that blocking admins for real is a bad idea;
but since that can't happen anyway, why bother altering the code?
-- Toby