On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Timwi wrote:
The TOC is invalid HTML for two major reasons:
* The top-level LI elements are not enclosed in an UL or OL
* The child ULs are outside the parent LIs.
It's also mysteriously in a table and there are no line breaks. :)
I notice that duplicate headings (which is not unlikely to occur with
subheadings) are marked with a numbered suffix after the first one. Better
than nothing, but this is fragile for linking; if the major sections are
rearranged in order, the numbers for the minor sections will change.
The [edit] link does not display when you're
logged out, but when you
log in it is set as a default. This is potentially confusing to users.
Settings should not change by creating an account :-)
Indeed. If we're adding features to make it easier to edit, I'm not sure
it makes sense to hide them from new users...
Another minor suggestion I made to Erik earlier but which would apparently
be "hard" with his regexps :) would be to have the section editing
separate on horizontal rules as well as headings. This would be
particularly helpful in talk pages and the Village Pump, where common
practice is to separate subdiscussions with rules, not headings.
* Linking into
the Special: namespace with parameters. See Brion's
separate mail for details.
Seems to work great! :-)
Woo-hoo!
-- brion vibber (brion @
pobox.com)