I just redeleted it. really, that's /not/ an
article. I'm not suggesting
that we keep gibberish, and I don't think anyone else is either (except, I
guess, whoever requested it be restored. And I would like to hear why it
was requested restored; I must have missed something).
On my personal page, I found the following text:
Dr. Engels: please review the criteria for deletion; namely the policy of not
deleting page titles that may become valid entries. If you disagree with the
policy, you should change the stated policy instead of violating it. Note that
the current policy is the result of discussion of various points (some of
which may have changed, because they were based partially on features of the
software which may have changed). That is not to say that it can't be changed,
but that there was serious consideration in coming up with the policy.
I give in that it does not exactly ask for restoring it, it does however
explicitly ask for not deleting it.