Hoi,
Having read the article, does it not make more sense and use Semantic
MediaWiki? This does provide an equivalence to the microformats without all
the overhead that is brought with yet another non integrated approach.
Thanks,
GerardM
2009/1/21 Magnus Manske <magnusmanske(a)googlemail.com>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microformat
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Gerard Meijssen
<gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hoi,
Can you explain what this is about. The blog you refer to does not make
any
sense to me. From my perspective, the last thing
that I want is more
clutter
and as it is not obvious what this is about, I
would consider it clutter.
Thanks,
GerardM
2009/1/20 Magnus Manske <magnusmanske(a)googlemail.com>
I just saw this:
http://developer.yahoo.net/blog/archives/2009/01/wikipedia_w_yql.html
Apparently, microformats are getting more easy to use, and are thus
increasingly used. We do use some microformats, but could we use more,
especially automated via templates?
Magnus
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l