On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 07:50:03PM +0200, Anthere wrote:
Gregory Maxwell a écrit:
On 4/18/05, Anthere <anthere9(a)yahoo.com>
yo. I think most of us would prefer it to be in
html... for quite a
number of reason (such as links).
HTML mails would make me unsub, perhaps that wouldn't be universally bad.
I did not understand what unsub means.
"un" and "subscribe" -- the opposite of subscribing
As far as links go, your MUA should see them and
make them clickable
even without html mail, I'm sure someone here can make some
recommendations for your platform...
I have no idea what MUA means.
Mail User Agent, roughly equivalent to "mail client" or "email
Outlook Express, Thunderbird, Sylpheed, Eudora, Pegasus, Evolution,
Mutt, Pine, Elm, et cetera, all have MUA functionality.
Hmm.. Inline images might have been useful in our
sexual images on wikipedia, I suppose... :)
I can't figure what you mean.
If I may dare say... this mailing list is international. It would be
helpful if people made an effort so as to be understandable to more people.
A snide response to that might be to compare your request to that of
others regarding a preference for text emails over HTML emails.
It is a general comment, not limited to you only. Maybe I am a bit
stupid these days.
Nothing of the sort. Sometimes, we need to be reminded of where we're
not making our modes of communication generally accessible, whether by
poorly chosen presentation technologies or by heavy use of jargon and
[ CCD CopyWrite | http://ccd.apotheon.org