Well, the good thing is that both those of us who would like to get
rid of many of these articles and those of us who would like to keep
them, agree that AfD isn't working :-)
Mark
On 26/01/07, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 26/01/07, Mark Wagner <carnildo(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On 1/26/07, J.L.W.S. The Special One
<hildanknight(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> What, if any, are the notability criteria
for schools?
The word "school" appears somewhere in
the article.
Seriously. There was a VfD a couple years back that garnered a large
number of "keep, schools are inherently notable" votes, even though
the article was a hoax and the school in question did not actually
exist. Another VfD from around that time resulted in a "keep" for the
same reasons, when article was actually a vanity piece about a
one-person business that happened to have "school" as part of its
name.
Yeah. It's an unfortunate reaction to various concerted efforts to
purge the school articles. This is part of why the structure of en:wp
AFD is demonstrably problematic.
- d.
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l