Oh, no! Don't make this about me! I took all
possible precautions in all
my previous messages not to make it about you--as a matter of fact, not
to make it about anyone. Also, I made it clear in my first message on
this topic in the other thread this was not about my entry not winning.
And finally, you're not talking about my submission in your message,
Oh. I must have confused you with Stygian. Sorry about that. You both seem
to be among the more professional designers. I did like the Fibonacci
spiral, but (ironically) thought it was too complex as well.
Can you really not see that the ultimate refinement
process, judging by what happened so far, would be to add centipedes,
neon lights, ants, a search button, lens flare, a kidney and a supernova
to the current proposal?
Sorry, I can't see that. Do you think that such proposals would find
consensus? I believe there's a general wide perception that Paullusmagnus'
logo, while good in concept, has too much and too narrowly placed
information. If that is so, then why should it not be possible to leverage
this widely shared perception into a positive change?