I can't determine accurately how to say "CHOP-ek.".
Did the writer mean "CHOP" like the word "chop"? Or does it rhyme with
"SHOW"? Or did they in fact *mean* "SHOW", since "CH" is
soft in many
And for that matter, how does the writer pronounce the word "chop"?
AmEng and BrEng have different vowels for that word.
The IPA (or a variant like SAMPA) is:
* portable. My Collins, Fowler's Modern English Usage, my French
Larousse -- they all use the IPA.
* international: the Esperanto, the German, the Spanish Wikipedias can
ALL use the same SAMPA transcription for the same article
"Hand-made" pronunciation guides are:
* individual & idiosyncratic. Two people with the same accent may write
different things, and may read them differently
* non-portable: people speakling different accents will interpret them
Paper encyclopedias expect their readers to learn the order of the
letters of the alphabet. Learning SAMPA is relatively simple. While the
table on [[SAMPA]] is increasingly complex, there is a shorter version
on a sub-page which a link like [[pronounced]] should direct readers to.
It's a small effort to learn, for a large gain afterwards.
Tom Parmenter wrote:
This list seems to have a bias in favor of leaping into
tables, math formulas, SAMPA. Next, musical notation?
I don't think this is the same over-complexity as tables and maths
formulae (may) prove to be. It's a common sense standardization, using
an internationally-accepted system.