On 14/12/2007, Tim 'avatar' Bartel <wikipedia(a)computerkultur.org> wrote:
David Gerard schrieb am 14.12.2007 09:22:
> On 14/12/2007, cohesion <cohesion(a)sleepyhead.org> wrote:
> It's not free content, so that immediately
makes it less useful or
> interesting in our terms. Sounds like about.com
or Scholarpedia, which
> are also non-free.
According to the Screenshot it would probably be released under
Oooh. Straight CC-by-3.0? That's excellent! If they require release
under a free licence then that's a BIG WIN for our aims.