Maybe a simple link at the bottom of a page saying "Authors of this Article"
with their contributions next to their names, somewhat like the differences
function we have already? And in the user page, user contributions with
percentage of articles contributed by that person (say an article on "Middle
English" contributed 78% by UserAlpha, and 10% by UserBeta, and other
percentages for other users). Just an idea.
James
-----Original Message-----
From: wikipedia-l-bounces(a)Wikimedia.org
[mailto:wikipedia-l-bounces@Wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of NSK
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 12:50 PM
To: wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l] A Solution to Larry Sanger's Criticisms -
ProjectHas Been Around For A While
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 06:40, Shaun MacPherson wrote:
I think the easiest way to make Wikipedia more
credible is with a Fact and Reference Project
It sounds like a good idea.
But it's not enough: You should also limit somehow the anon contributions
and
employ maintainers for each article (this is what I do on most of my
projects). The names (full names) of the authors and maintainers must be
visible in the article, together with 1 or 2-line short bios demonstrating
their expertise (degrees or work experience), as well as a References
section
(which should be long - very long).
See my policy here:
http://nerdypc.wikinerds.org/index.php/Help:Editing_process
--
NSK
The Wikinerds Community Federation of Science Wikis
Owner of the Wikinerds Portal
http://portal.wikinerds.org
Owner of the NerdyPC IT Wiki
http://www.nerdypc.org
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l