Erik Moeller wrote:
I believe there's a general wide perception that
Paullusmagnus'
logo, while good in concept, has too much and too narrowly placed
information. If that is so, then why should it not be possible to leverage
this widely shared perception into a positive change?
Because this cluttered version
http://meta.wikipedia.org/upload/archive/b/b3/20030723122803!Paullusmagnus-…
didn't win; it had to be refined to this even more cluttered version
http://meta.wikipedia.org/upload/7/75/Paullusmagnus-logo_%28small%29_reload…
via collaborative design and consensus in order to win. That's why I
think more refinement via more collaborative design and more consensus
will only result in more clutter. I can only pray I'm wrong.
Gutza