Sean Barrett wrote:
My question is this: can we use their material, as long as we reproduce it accurately and not in a misleading context, and credit it like we credit FOLDOC and other sources? The license does not say anything about derivative work.
I don't think we can use it. Anything we use has to be compatible with us re-releasing it under the GNU FDL, which means giving people permission to make derivative works from it if they live up to the conditions of the license. As we have no right to make derivative works of Crown Copyright material, we have no right to authorize others to do so, either.
--Jimbo