It is indeed true that areas relating to "the home country" are very
likely to be influenced, at least to some degree, by people whose
first language is not English.
You make an interesting point, too. There is widespread unconcious
discrimination on Wikipedia.
Mr. Randombtr will be trusted less about Chinese history than Mr.
Uneducatedchinesefarmer, even though there is a possibility that Mr.
Randombtr has his Ph.D in Chinese history and has lived in China for
20 years - after all, Mr. Uneducatedchinesefarmer is actually Chinese.
Even if he never saw a history textbook, or if he moved to the UK at
age 3 and never learnt much about Chinese history than some half
truth, half legend that his grandparents taught him (probably more
likely - uneducated Chinese farmers are unlikely to be editing on
en:), he is trusted disproportionately more because "he is Chinese".
This can be found in the real world as well, but more often than not
it is based on the colour of one's skin and the shape of one's eyes
rather than heritage and so a man of Japanese heritage born and raised
in London will be trusted more regarding Chinese history than will a
BTR woman who was born and raised in Beijing and completed university
there simply because she doesn't look "Asian" but he does.
But that is getting off topic and I don't think anybody denies it to a
large degree, so back to the topic at hand.
Since on most smaller Wikipedias there is usually nobody with enough
knowledge about "home countries" other than their own to write much
about them, articles such as that are often translations of the
English or teh French version.
If a man on the Cantonese Wikipedia (which doesn't actually exist...
yet) were to write an article on "Vienna U-Bahn" (that's Vienna
Underground, isn't it?), excluding the possibility that he lives or
lived at one point in Vienna and knows more than a little bit about
the U-Bahn, he will most likely translate from the English or French
version, or (perhaps a bit less common) research it on Google to write
an original article; in many cases he will use a mixture of the
English version and information from Google and completely organise it
into what seems like an original article but contains mostly the same
information.
Because of this, articles about "the home country" tend to vary little
between Wikipedias (especially smaller ones), and since they are by
far en:'s articles most influenced by people whose first language is
not English, the "POV balancing" and "fact correction" that occurs in
articles by non first language-speakers on en: is spread around across
projects like butter on bread. Thus, the degree of inherent POV in all
Wikipedias is very similar because of this repeated exchange of a
narrow range of articles.
Mark (am I "the other Mark"?)
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 01:48:33 -0500, Delirium <delirium(a)hackish.org> wrote:
Mark Williamson wrote:
All these factors combined mean that en: is still
very much shaped by
the collective cultural experiences of its editors, and thus while we
try to remove systemic bias we still miss some important POV holdouts
because they don't jump out at us, and en: is still very much an
encyclopaedia written from an
American-Australian-NewZealandic-Canadian-British perspective/POV with
only relatively minor counterbalances from those whose cultural
experiences fall outside those of the aforementioned English-native
group.
This depends a lot on where on en: Wikipedia you look. Many of the
articles related to mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan have been
edited by people who actually live there, and their opinions tend to be
given somewhat disproportionate weight, as they're presumed to know what
they're talking about (not exclusive weight, but more than my opinions
on Hong Kong would be given). There was even a class in Hong Kong whose
teacher had his students go around on en: adding articles on different
places, companies, etc. in the city.
Just now I clicked on "Random page", and I got [[Vienna U-Bahn]],
written by [[User:ThomasK]], whose user page indicates he lives in
Vienna. Etc.
Percentage-wise, non-English-world users might not make up a large
proportion of the editors, but their influence is fairly strong,
especially on subjects related to their home country.
-Mark
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l