> Is there a way I can make the new site show up in something
> other than Clearlyu (and hopefully still see non-Latin
> characters)? Clearly has only one size and no bold or italics,
> and I don't like it.
There's certainly nothing I can do--that's entirely a browser
issue. All I can do is send valid HTML. It's up to your browser
and OS to render it.
0
I just started testing the new server, or I would have liked to, but is
really awfully slow. It repeatedly refused connection, and when it displays
pages at all, it does so very slowly.
I know that's not the fault of the script (it was much faster on the piclab
server), and not my Internet connection either (other sites work with normal
speed).
It probably ain't the new server, either. So, could it be the Bomis bandwidth?
That could explain the "getting stuck" of the current software as well.
Jimbo?
It just took a minute or two to save a "Sandbox" test. Very disturbing.
Magnus
________________________________________
Zeitschriftenabos online bestellen - jetzt neu im Infoboten! http://www.epost.de
Don't usually get this message, but did this morning:
Warning: Too many connections in
/home/wiki-newest/work-http/databaseFunctions.php on line 11
Could not connect to MySQL server:
Fred Bauder
Is there a way I can make the new site show up in something other than
Clearlyu (and hopefully still see non-Latin characters)? Clearlyu has only
one size and no bold or italics, and I don't like it.
phma
wow. My first impression of any post-1900 artwork is "copyrighted." Where did you find it (commissioned by the Cuban government?).
kq
You Wrote:
>Do not delete che.png. I uploaded it, and it is not a copyright
>violation.
>--
> Sean Barrett | Pereant, inquit, qui ante nos nostra dixerunt.
> sean(a)epoptic.com |
0
On Tuesday 02 July 2002 02:10 am, Toby Bartels wrote:
> You know what would make writing unambiguous links easier?
> I'd like to say "[[Mercury (planet)|Mercury]]" without repeating "Mercury".
> Would it work to have a feature such that, say, "[[Mercury]](planet)"
> (with no space) produces that effect?
That would be cool. Or simply have the software, by default ignore anything
in parenthesis and only display the non-parenthetical term:
So that [[Mercury (planet)]] is displayed as simply <u>Mercury</u>. Or if
this is deemed inappropriate default behavior, maybe add just the | and/or ~,
* or whatever to turn this feature on: [[Mercury (planet)|*]] yields
<u>Mercury</u>.
Alleviating the tedium of making links to parenthetical titles would be most
useful.
--maveric149
On Tuesday 02 July 2002 02:10 am, Toby Bartels wrote:
> What's important to me is that Bryan Derksen is right,
> and we should make sure that he continues to be right:
Just a clarification -- I have not been arguing for the abolition, or even
serious curtailing of the disambiguation process or even of disambiguation
pages themselves as they currently are. My concern has been over the increase
in the creation of disambiguation pages in cases where there has
been_any_ambiguity over what is meant by a given term -- even when there is
an obvious most common use of the term (at least in the form presented --
[[worm]] for example). The reasoning behind my view, is that I wish to
preserve spontaneous linking to articles whenever possible, so that we can
avoid parenthetical disambiguation like [[worm (biology)]] (because, unlike
computer worms, the animals are only known as "worms" in English -- which
included several phyla of animals).
> "''This article is about worms, the animals. There is also a Wikipedia
> article about [[computer worm]]s.'' "
I love it! Short, to the point and quickly directs people to where they need
to go. This way the page titled [[worm]] can be both a disambiguation page
(in block format) AND an article about the most common usage of the simple
term "worm" (use of the word "worm" by itself in a computer article is just
jargon, "computer worm" is what is used when context must be established by
the term itself -- such as in a hypertext encyclopedia or in news reporting).
> Currently, the computer bit is at the bottom, which I too don't like.
I've never been very comfortable with using "see also" for disambiguation
either -- I just couldn't think of a way to make it work at the top of the
page (and my early attempts were ugly and quickly reverted by others).
> But I think that it's important to keep the top stuff *short* --
> get people to the right page, and then start the article.
I agree.
--maveric149
> I'm taking their heads off - or at least I'm trying.
> To which Lee Daniel answered:
> Are you wrong you're aware of the Nupedia group?
I was going for something like "Were you mistaken in
recognizing the Nupedia list?", but I may not have gotten
it right. I figured maybe you meant to have the Lojban
signature for postings on the Lojban list.
0
كاس العالم 01.jpg
honey.jpg
sebasww203.jpg (just too large to be of practical use, though its companion may be relevant)
2.bmp (uncompressed)
murf.jpg (cute dog. did he save the President's life?)
murf2.jpg ""
che.png (I love you, Che, but 10 gets you 100 you're a copyright violation)Foto1.JPG (nice lighting. adjust levels in photoshop and crop some and you'd have a good picture. do that and put it on a personal page and you'd have a good picture in its proper context)
0