Jimmy Wales <jwales(a)bomis.com> napisał:
>Yes, by all means, let's post a draft. But yes, since I'm paying for
> it to be sent out, I'll have to approve the final version. :-)
never has any disrespect been meant. we all know that bomis pays for the 'pedia.
> Still, I'm all for letting the community speak through the press
> release and the wiki process.
that was my point. if it is going to be a community release let the community speak. bomis can release statements anytime it wants to do so.
regards,
+wojpob
--
Tego nie znajdziesz w zadnym sklepie!
[ http://oferty.onet.pl ]
hi all.
regarding the press release (1st anniversary & co.): are we going to put up a draft on the meta site? Or is it going to be a /Bomis/ press release?
regards,
wojpob
--
Tego nie znajdziesz w zadnym sklepie!
[ http://oferty.onet.pl ]
>http://meta.wikipedia.com/ is fixed. And I learned (the hard way!)
>some new things!
Many thanks. I can now confirm that meta's HTML makes no
incorrect claims about its own encoding as the main site does.
0
I obviously have no idea what I'm doing, so I was unable to fix
meta.wikipedia.com. Jason will be at work tomorrow, he'll know what
to do.
Obviously before we go live with Magnus's software, I'm going to have
to take a crash course in php and related matters so that I can
reliably fix little things that go wrong. :-(
--Jimbo
Thank you Mr. Crocker for reminding me. Yes -
meta.wikipedia.com has been showing MySQL errors for at
least five days and is unusable. All the previous
content no longer displays either.
I hope someone is trying to correct this.
As Ever,
Ruth Ifcher
--
> I'm not sure when it happened, but somewhere the main Wikipedia site
> started putting out HTML with:
>
> ?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?
> ...
> !DOCTYPE html
> PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML Basic 1.0//EN"
> ...
>
> None of the above is even close to the truth, and for the code to
> claim it is will cause many problems. The HTTP headers simply claim
> that the text is "HTML" and that the encoding is "ISO-8859-1", both
> of which are accurate and useful; this is the way UseMod has always
> worked and still does, so I don't know where the new stuff came from.
> This needs to be fixed.
>
> "Meta" is too broken now for me to check.
0