Yes, I do know how Arbitration on Wikimedia projects work.<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/20/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Nathan Reed</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:nathanreed@gmail.com">nathanreed@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:
</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br><div><span class="q"><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/20/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">
James Hare</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:messedrocker@gmail.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">messedrocker@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:</span></span><span class="q"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">

I personally believe it is inaccurate to describe this as a content situation. If ArbCom were to intervene, it would be if PVJ or another party were to take it too far.<br><br><br></blockquote></span></div><br>The ArbCom must not intervene unless an editor requests arbitration. The Arbitration Committee is charged with resolving disputes between editors -- this issue could be framed as a dispute between editors, I suppose. I would be loathe to take it up, however.
<br><br>-N.<br clear="all"><span class="sg"><br>-- </span><div><span class="e" id="q_10e68095e78b84d5_5"><br>Nathan Reed<br><a href="mailto:nathanreed@gmail.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
nathanreed@gmail.com</a>

</span></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>Wikinews-l mailing list<br><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="mailto:Wikinews-l@Wikimedia.org">Wikinews-l@Wikimedia.org</a>
<br><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinews-l" target="_blank">http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinews-l</a><br><br><br></blockquote>
</div><br>