In the case of the Spanish Wikinews, I don't think there was a choice
of licence. By some reason, it was created with the GFDL licence and we
notice that we had a different licence several months after the
Creation. I don't think we want to stick to a specific licence. We will
prefer to use the same licence that the other Wikinews projects.<br><br>
Ascánder<br>
<br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/3/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">Dariusz Siedlecki</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:datrio@gmail.com">datrio@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
&gt; On 8/3/05, Amgine &lt;<a href="mailto:amgine@saewyc.net">amgine@saewyc.net</a>&gt; wrote:<br>&gt; &gt; As far as I am aware, it is not possible for any of the Wikinews<br>&gt; &gt; editions to choose a license. The WMF Board is the only group which can
<br>&gt; &gt; choose a license, and what I understood was they would like the project<br>&gt; &gt; as a whole to select a license which is most compatible with the goals<br>&gt; &gt; of the entire project, not any single edition.
<br><br>Yes, but Jimbo wanted to hear everyone's opinion on this topic. As to<br>the questions I raised, I too think that CC-By-SA will be the best,<br>and we need to relicense the content ASAP.<br><br>--<br>Best regards,
<br>Dariusz &quot;Datrio&quot; Siedlecki<br>_______________________________________________<br>Wikinews-l mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Wikinews-l@Wikimedia.org">Wikinews-l@Wikimedia.org</a><br><a href="http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinews-l">
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinews-l</a><br></blockquote></div><br>