I know you do and didn't mean to imply otherwise... Just being adamant and clear on a public list. Don't want readers to be confused. :D

-N.

On 10/20/06, James Hare <messedrocker@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, I do know how Arbitration on Wikimedia projects work.

On 10/20/06, Nathan Reed < nathanreed@gmail.com> wrote:

On 10/20/06, James Hare <messedrocker@gmail.com> wrote:
I personally believe it is inaccurate to describe this as a content situation. If ArbCom were to intervene, it would be if PVJ or another party were to take it too far.



The ArbCom must not intervene unless an editor requests arbitration. The Arbitration Committee is charged with resolving disputes between editors -- this issue could be framed as a dispute between editors, I suppose. I would be loathe to take it up, however.

-N.

--

_______________________________________________
Wikinews-l mailing list
Wikinews-l@Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinews-l




_______________________________________________
Wikinews-l mailing list
Wikinews-l@Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinews-l





--
Nathan Reed
nathanreed@gmail.com