Yea. Forgive me.  For some reason I had the wild ass notion that the old articles were GFDL.  I really don't know where that came from. 

-Jon

On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 22:18, Ilya Haykinson <haykinson@gmail.com> wrote:
I agree with Bawolff on this one. The license change is mainly a
problem for GFDL wikis, which suffer from some problems with
attribution and reuse in CC-licensed projects as a result of their
license. We do not have this issue, and don't really need to change.
Even if we wanted to, we would face an uphill battle in making our
license more restrictive retroactively. Unless there's an overriding
reason to do so, I'd elect to retain our more-free license in place.
Goodness knows, we don't need _more_ restrictions on reuse of Wikinews
content ;-)

-ilya

On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 5:04 PM, bawolff <bawolff+wn@gmail.com> wrote:
> From my understanding, wmf wants to change the lices from gfdl to
> cc-by-sa-(3? not sure on version) which is quite different than cc-by
> (similar to the difference between GPL and BSD from my understanding).
> We also don't really have the ability to arbitrary change license (we
> could say something like from this day forward, everything is blah
> license, but thats messy).
>
> Anyways, i think our license is pretty good. Many people feel that
> modifying wikinews content without allowing redistribution is a
> perfectly good use of our content, which a change in license would
> disallow.
>
> --
> - bawolff
>
> p.s. everything before sep 05 is PD, not GFDL. We currently have only
> a single gfdl article in all of wikinews (not counting help ns +
> images)
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Jon Davis <wiki@konsoletek.com> wrote:
>> I realize we all _love_ a conversation about changing licenses... but here I
>> go.
>>
>> The WMF has been disusing the change of WP from GFDL to CC-BY (since that is
>> now allowed for a short period of time).  Since everything newer than Sept
>> 05 on en.wn is CC-BY-2.5 (and everything older than that is GFDL)... why
>> can't we "upgrade" all the old articles to CC-BY also?  I realize we don't
>> "need" to do it, as the old articles are of little interest to most people,
>> but we have the opportunity... shouldn't we take it?
>>
>> -Jon
>> [[User:ShakataGaNai]]
>>
>> --
>> This is a test of the emergency sig system.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikinews-l mailing list
>> Wikinews-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinews-l
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikinews-l mailing list
> Wikinews-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinews-l
>

_______________________________________________
Wikinews-l mailing list
Wikinews-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinews-l



--
This is a test of the emergency sig system.  

Oh, and the following location only accurate +/- 100 miles.  So if you're coming to get me, better send a nuke.
Sent from: Sunnyvale CA United States.