How come you say The News is not relevent to you or Htoo Myint Naung? That is how you claim to other people, isn't? That is how you claim to funding agency, isn't?
 
Please also see how Ravi told about you and Ko Ngwe Tun told about you. You got to say exactly what you did. Not more.
 
Good luck,
Okisan

On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Michael Everson <everson@evertype.com> wrote:
At 22:10 +0900 2008-07-26, Kyaw Tun wrote:

>>>You have to defend it.
>>
>>I do not have to defend the Anawrahta against your false accusation.
>
>I think if you read
><http://myanmaritpros.com/forum/topic/show?id=1445004%3ATopic%3A46587>this
>post, it will clear why it happens.

This does not explain why you said many times on a public forum that
Anawrahta is a "fake" Unicode project. What you said was false. I
told you it was false. You should retract your false statement and
apologize.

I have also told you MANY MANY TIMES that I had nothing to do with
the interview in the Myanmar Times. No one from that organization
ever contacted me. Furthermore, you blame BOTH Htoo Myint Naung and
me on the very thread you just posted for the content of the article
in the Myanmar Times. The person who is ultimately responsible for
that content is the reporter, not Htoo Myint Naung, and certainly not
me.

It is SHAMEFUL for you to say, here, again, that "they are claiming
what they are not". I have made no false claims. I have on MANY
occasions told you that you are making false claims about me and my
work and I have asked you to stop. Here you have done it again.

I worked very hard to get the UTC and WG2 to accept the changes that
FIXED the problems the Myanmar 4.1 encoding had. That was not easy,
and had it not been done, computing in the Burmese language and in
the minority languages of your country could not have been
accomplished. Since then I have helped to encode even more Myanmar
characters for minority languages. Yet you say nothing about these
accomplishments. You say nothing about this service to your nation.

You're welcome.

>>>I follow on facts.
>>
>>It is a fiction of your own. I know perfectly well that Anawrahta
>>exists, and I have told you so. Therefore for you to continue to
>>maintain a page about it being a "fake" is a sign of bad faith on
>>your part.
>
>Anawrahta does exist. I never deny. The fake is there because such
>small thing talk like a big. Please read the above post. It is not
>mine.

The words "fake Unicode project" means that Anawrahta does not exist.
It is an act of bad faith for you to maintain a web page claiming
that it is "fake".

>Except my downright critic, I am responsible and describe to the
>best of my knowledge.

I have corrected your knowledge several times and all you have done
is told me that you were right after all. That is most regrettable.
--
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com

_______________________________________________
Wikimy-l mailing list
Wikimy-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimy-l