I would like correct fews.
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Htoo Myint Naung
<vox@technomation.org> wrote:
There's one thing I can say about, the typeface quality. Almost ALL ASCII fonts which are used in these day's publications are converting to Unicode while pseudo-unicode developers are fighting a font war.
I know you have a tool from converting ASCII to Unicode. But that is monopolized way to solving the problem.
Even if Zaw Win Myat do it for you, you cannot take it.
And I can say a few number of BIG publishers are using Unicode 5.1 now.
Show me now.
There is nothing you need to worry about typeface.
And I cannot see a COMMERCIAL unicode 5.1 font yet.
Yes. This is not the right to sale 5.1 font.
I suspect I cannot get people to believe unicode is the right solution if there aren't people who are saying pseudo-unicode fonts are better.
Many people are saying pseudo-unicode fonts are better if you read on the web. But Okisan never say Zawgyi is better for
my.wikipedia.org.
Htoo
Best regards,
Okisan