On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 8:25 PM, Michael Everson
<everson@evertype.com> wrote:
At 20:12 +0900 2008-07-26, Kyaw Tun wrote:
>You have to defend it.
I do not have to defend the Anawrahta against your false accusation.
I think if you read
this post, it will clear why it happens.
>It is public testimonial.
It is a public slander.
NO.
>I follow on facts.
It is a fiction of your own. I know perfectly well that Anawrahta
exists, and I have told you so. Therefore for you to continue to
maintain a page about it being a "fake" is a sign of bad faith on
your part.
Anawrahta does exist. I never deny. The fake is there because such small thing talk like a big. Please read the above post. It is not mine.
>How come you demand to remove it before replying in
><http://myanmaritpros.com/forum/topic/show?id=1445004%3ATopic%3A47521>the
>forum?
I have already wasted time on that forum, and I already DID explain
on that forum that your accusation was false.
You left exactly the FAKE part.
>I am very responsible person. I am a researcher and very careful
>about wording and tried all statement supported. Anything there, I
>will elaborate upon request.
I don't believe you. You have insulted me publicly, you have not
accepted the civil explanation which I gave on your forum.
MMITPros is the most respected and technically competent forum for Myanamr IT community.
>But first note, this start on media statement, not me.
I had nothing to do with the media statement. Yet you used it to
cause harm to me, to my reputation, to the reputation of the Myanmar
Wikipedia, and to Ko Htoo Myint Naung.
That is shameful, and it is not the sign of a "very responsible
person" who is "careful" about wording.
--
Except my downright critic, I am responsible and describe to the best of my knowledge.
Okisan