ശ്രേഷ്ഠഭാഷാ പദവി നേടിയ മലയാളഭാഷയുടെ വികസനത്തിനായി കേരള സർക്കാർ
അവതരിപ്പിക്കാനുദ്ദേശിക്കുന്ന കർമ്മപദ്ധതിയിൽ ഉയർന്നു വന്ന ഒരു നിർദ്ദേശം
"വിക്കിപ്പീഡിയയിൽ മലയാളം അധ്യായങ്ങളുടെ എണ്ണം രണ്ടു ലക്ഷം ആക്കുക" ആണെന്നു
ഇന്നത്തെ മലയാള മനോരമ ദിനപ്പത്രത്തിൽ കണ്ടു. ഇതിന്റെ ഓൺലൈൻ പതിപ്പിന്റെ
സ്ക്രീൻഷോട്ട് ഇവിട <http://minus.com/lIAqG0AP4yolv>
ഇതെങ്ങനെയാണു നടപ്പിൽ വരുത്താനുദ്ദേശിക്കുന്നത് എന്നതിനെക്കുറിച്ച്
ആർക്കെങ്കിലും കൂടുതൽ വിവരങ്ങൾ അറിയുമോ?
--
With Regards,
Anoop
എല്ലാ ഭാഷകളിലും ഉള്ള വിക്കിഗ്രന്ഥശാലകളെ യോജിപ്പിച്ച് (തിരിച്ച് പഴേ പോലെ
ആക്കുക എന്നാവും കൂടുതൽ യോജിക്കുക കാരണം മുൻപ് അങ്ങനെ ആയിരുന്നു) ഒറ്റ
പദ്ധതിയാക്കുന്നതിനുള്ള ഒരു ചർച്ച വിക്കിസൊർസിന്റെ പ്രധാനമെയിലിങ്ങ് ലിസ്റ്റിൽ
നടക്കുന്നു. താൽപര്യമുള്ളവർ ചർച്ചയിൽ പങ്കെടുക്കുമല്ലോ
ഷിജു
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Alex Brollo <alex.brollo(a)gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 12:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Wikisource-l] Reunification of Wikisources
To: "discussion list for Wikisource, the free library" <
wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
I imagine something like "a shared proofreading lab" with shared tools; a
"shared html/xml standard" for final book output; a "shared library" for
level-4 quality books, fully and easily usable and deeply indexed for any
wiki project and external users.
I presume that such goals are someway indipendent, but the strategy to get
them shold consider the principle "If you are repeating yourself, you are
going wrong".
Alex
2013/6/2 David Cuenca <dacuetu(a)gmail.com>
> Hi Billinghurst,
>
> Thanks for your sharing your concerns and sorry if I didn't outline the
> problems in my email. I thought the main ones were already well-known,
> namely:
> - Redundancy of templates/modules, everything has to be done again for
> each language Wikisource and it is not easy to benefit from the advances
> from other communities
> - Having small disperse communities makes harder to keep their tools
> up-to-date and to share know-how
> - Hard to have cross-language projects (like multi-lingual books)
>
> While on the Amsterdam Hackathon I asked several people about why the
> project was split, but I didn't get a clear answer. I can imagine that it
> was because back in the day there were no easy ways of localizing
> templates, documentation, etc. but if you find any conversation or decision
> in the archives, please do share it.
>
> If we, as Wikisource users, should "push harder to get components to
> strengthen our community", then it is a good thing to start this debate to
> know what is wanted.
> The proposed centralization of modules (see below), it is only one way of
> approaching it, however I think it is important to consider all options to
> make sure it is the best way.
>
> Cheers,
> David --Micru
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:40 PM, billinghurst <billinghurst(a)gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> This seems more like "a solution in search of a problem".
>>
>> What is the problem?
>> How is the current situation not working?
>> What are you trying to solve?
>> Where is the review of why the split to language communities?
>> What are the benefits?
>>
>> If this is about shared tools, or better integration of specific
>> components, then let us isolate the problems, then work to the solution.
>> Pushing harder on WMF to get components that strengthen our community,
>> provide a better product, and more resource productve, and are part of
>> their ultimate plan is worthwhile. Starting with a solution isn't going to
>> get the best result.
>>
>> Regards, Billinghurst
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 20:22:38 -0400, David Cuenca <dacuetu(a)gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Jane, hi Alex,
>> >
>> > Yes, I agree with you that a centralized Wikisource would be quite
>> > meaningful, specially now that projects like Wikidata have shown that it
>> is
>> > possible to have both localization and centralization living in harmony.
>> > I know that Doug (cc'ed) did some experiments with this goal in mind,
>> but I
>> > have no idea how far he is now.
>> > Apart from the technical challenge, it also worries me the social
>> aspect.
>> > Wikisourcerors from each Wikisource and have lived in isolation from
>> each
>> > other for a long time. How would be a reunification perceived by the
>> > different communities? Would it be something wanted?
>> >
>> > Andrea and me have the pending task of contacting the communities, so
>> this
>> > is something that we should bring up among other important topics (like
>> the
>> > creation of a Wikisource User Group:
>> > http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_User_Groups)
>> >
>> > The OPW is a grant program for students similar to Google Summer of Code
>> > focused on helping bring more female contributors to open source
>> projects.
>> > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Outreach_Program_for_Women
>> > So yes, it is a gendergap project, but we can offer wikisource-related
>> > projects as we did with GsoC.
>> >
>> > David --Micru
>> >
>> > PS: Some of those plates are quite scary... I love them :)
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 4:12 AM, Jane Darnell <jane023(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi David and Alex,
>> >> I am also starting to think that one project would be a whole lot
>> >> simpler, especially given the lack of cross-referencing between
>> >> projects, which would be nice to have in the wikisource of many
>> >> popular wikipedia languages - especially for translated texts.
>> >>
>> >> Years ago, while researching an urban legend, I took some photographs
>> >> of the engravings and the table of contents of a Latin book and its
>> >> Dutch translation a century later. At the time I was toying with the
>> >> idea of cross referencing the stories but realized quickly there was
>> >> no way to do this on Wikisource. I put my scans here:
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Observationes_Medicae_by_Nicolae…
>> >>
>> >> Wouldn't it be easier to have just one Wikisource and have all
>> >> language-related information reside in interface layers and for the
>> >> language of texts, the category structure? This would make the Lua
>> >> interface easier to achieve and work on.
>> >>
>> >> David, do you mean by "Outreach Program for Women" to refer to a
>> >> specific wikisource project other than the general ones we have for
>> >> the gendergap project?
>> >>
>> >> Jane
>> >>
>> >> 2013/5/31, Alex Brollo <alex.brollo(a)gmail.com>:
>> >> > I agree fully Micru.
>> >> > Obviously, my dream is something much simpler and clear-cut: a unique
>> >> > wikisource for all languages, since an unique project for any textual
>> >> media
>> >> > is needed IMHO just as a common project for any non-textual media is
>> >> > running: Commons; and a common project for data now exists: Wikidata.
>> >> >
>> >> > And now, let's go to explore Lua a little bit more.... I presume,
>> that
>> >> > mw.loaderData() can read a table of Lua functions too, if I
>> understand
>> >> Lua
>> >> > table features. So, shared modules could perhaps be hosted into one
>> >> > data
>> >> > module only. Let's try ....
>> >> >
>> >> > Alex
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > 2013/5/31 David Cuenca <dacuetu(a)gmail.com>
>> >> >
>> >> >> Hi all,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> After a talk with Brad Jorsch during the Hackathon (thanks again
>> Brad
>> >> for
>> >> >> your patience), it became clear to me that Lua modules can be
>> >> >> localized
>> >> >> either by using system messages or by getting the project language
>> >> >> code
>> >> >> (mw.getContentLanguage().getCode()) and then switching the message.
>> >> >> This
>> >> >> second option is less integrated with the translation system, but
>> can
>> >> >> serve
>> >> >> as intermediate step to get things running.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> For Wikisource it would be nice to have a central repository
>> (sitting
>> >> >> on
>> >> >> wikisource.org) of localized Lua modules and associated templates.
>> The
>> >> >> documentation could be translated using Extension:Translate. These
>> >> >> modules,
>> >> >> templates and associated documentation would be then synchronized
>> with
>> >> >> all
>> >> >> the language wikisources that subscribe to an opt-in list. Users
>> would
>> >> be
>> >> >> then advised to modify the central module, thus all language
>> versions
>> >> >> would
>> >> >> benefit of the improvements. This could be the first experiment of
>> >> having
>> >> >> a
>> >> >> centralized repository of modules.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> What do you think of this? Would be anyone available to mentor an
>> >> >> Outreach
>> >> >> Program for Women project?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks,
>> >> >> David Cuenca --Micru
>> >> >>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikisource-l mailing list
>> Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Etiamsi omnes, ego non
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikisource-l mailing list
> Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
പഴയൊരു പദ്ധതിപേജ് പൊടി തട്ടിയെടുത്തിട്ടുണ്ട്. ക്യാമറയുള്ള
സുഹൃത്തുക്കളെല്ലാം ഈ ലിങ്ക് ബുക്ക് മാര്‍ക്ക് ചെയ്ത് വയ്ക്കുക.
വിക്കിപീഡിയയിലേക്ക് ലേഖനമെഴുതാതെയും മിഴിവാര്‍ന്ന ചിത്രങ്ങളെടുത്ത് അപ്ലോഡ്
ചെയ്ത് നിങ്ങള്‍ക്കും ഈ സ്വതന്ത്രവിജ്ഞാനമുന്നേറ്റത്തിന്റെ ഭാഗമാവാം.
http://ml.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:Image_requested
അരിയുണ്ടയ്ക്കും അച്ചപ്പത്തിനും വെള്ളയപ്പത്തിനും പോലും ലേഖനം അന്വേഷിച്ച്
വരുന്നവര്‍ക്ക് കാണിച്ച് കൊടുക്കാന്‍ നല്ലൊരു ചിത്രമില്ലെന്നതാണ്
ഗതികേട്.ഒപ്പം ശുഷ്കമായ പേജുകളിലെ ഉള്ളടക്കം കുറച്ച് വിപുലപ്പെടുത്തുകയും
ചെയ്യാം. ലേഖനങ്ങള്‍ക്ക് ചിത്രങ്ങള്‍ വേണമെന്ന് റിക്വസ്റ്റ് ചെയ്യപ്പെടുന്നവ
ഡൈനാമിക്ക് ആയി (പൂച്ചമരം/കാറ്റ് ട്രീ) ഈ പേജില്‍ കാണിക്കും.
കൂടുതല്‍ അഭിപ്രായങ്ങളും പേജിലെ മാറ്റങ്ങളും സ്വാഗതം ചെയ്യുന്നു. :)
Manoj.K/മനോജ്.കെ
www.manojkmohan.com
"We are born free...No gates or windows can snatch our freedom...Use
GNU/Linux - it keeps you free."