On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:58 AM, phoebe ayers <phoebe.wiki@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Samuel Klein <meta.sj@gmail.com> wrote:

Wikimedians in the United States would actually be a great name,

> +1
> Kirill

+1
SJ

Agreed, I also like Wikimedia US Community ... but I'd add "group": Wikimedia US Community Group. (Maybe that can be the descriptive subtitle for whatever name is chosen). IMHO the name is mostly for outside people -- i.e. GLAM institutions who want a point of contact, new people looking for a community group to join -- which means it should be pretty straightforward & obvious about what is going on!

-- phoebe

This is my sort of reservation with just "Wikimedians in the United States"; that it doesn't give the impression of a *group*, of a distinct if informal entity that could be a point of contact for GLAM institutions, etc.

Thanks,

Richard

(User:Pharos)