The idea that all US chapters would have only a single voice in movement-wide discussions. This hasn't been demanded except by tiny minority among other chapters -- and certainly not by anyone who will actually be involved in recognizing future US chapters.
Which political concessions are you referring to?-Greg____________Sent from my iPhone. Apologies for any typos. A more detailed response may be sent later.It's entirely unclear to me why we're proposing to make such dramatic political concessions, particularly given the lack of any meaningful external pressure to do so.
Cheers,Kirill--Kirill LokshinSecretary | Wikimedia District of Columbiahttp://wikimediadc.org | @wikimediadcOn Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Kevin Rutherford <Ktr101@hotmail.com> wrote:Hey Everyone,I hope that you have all been doing well and those who attended Wikimania have not been partying too hard after the awesome experiences of the last few days. I wanted to let you all know, that per a WALRUS meet-up discussion tonight, myself and two other users have drafted up a plan on the evolution and governance of future Wikimedia chapters: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposal_for_the_evolution_of_Wikimedia_chapters_in_the_United_StatesWe look forward to your opinion on it, and I hope that those who are in the D.C. region have safe trips back, over the next few days.
Sincerely,Kevin RutherfordKtr101
_______________________________________________
Wikimediaus-l mailing list
Wikimediaus-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaus-l
_______________________________________________
Wikimediaus-l mailing list
Wikimediaus-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaus-l
_______________________________________________
Wikimediaus-l mailing list
Wikimediaus-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaus-l