Hi Andy, I'll drop you an email separately and we can do it manually at this end. As for the certificate, I've had a few reports of problems but haven't been able to replicate them, and the certificate seems fine... so I will ask greater minds (ie. Tom & Emmanuel) to have a look at it. Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* On 15 October 2015 at 11:38, Andy Mabbett <andy(a)pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Richard Symonds <richard.symonds(a)wikimedia.org.uk> wrote: "You are not authorized to access bug #402. To see this bug, you must first log in to an account with the appropriate permissions. " So I create an account, but the confirmation email doesnt arrive... -- John Vandenberg _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk

On 15/10/15 23:53, John Mark Vandenberg wrote: I am slightly surprised that this is with Bugzilla at all. And not with Phabricator? https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Phabricator https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Phabricator/versus_Bugzilla Gordo _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk

Okay I am at a loss now. I have re-installed, refreshed, hacked around with the certificate chains and cannot get any different result. As it is, I cannot emulate the issue in any reliable form :( (except for once, briefly) Tom On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 at 13:16 Richard Symonds < richard.symonds(a)wikimedia.org.uk&gt; wrote: -- THOMAS MORTON Development Operations Engineer 01777861607 | thomas.morton(a)thesalegroup.co.uk THESALEGROUP.CO.UK <http://www.thesalegroup.co.uk/> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk

On 16 Oct 2015, at 13:54, Thomas Morton &lt;morton.thomas(a)googlemail.com&gt; wrote: Thanks John. SO I think I might have nailed it... anyone care to independently test? Tom On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 at 13:45 John Mark Vandenberg &lt;jayvdb(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: Thomas, you might like to try using pywikibot to access the uk chapter wiki ... ? That is how I encountered the cert problem, and it fails fairly reliably on Python 2.7.5 unix. https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/246213/ On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Thomas Morton &lt;morton.thomas(a)googlemail.com&gt; wrote: Okay I am at a loss now. I have re-installed, refreshed, hacked around with the certificate chains and cannot get any different result. As it is, I cannot emulate the issue in any reliable form :( (except for once, briefly) Tom On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 at 13:16 Richard Symonds &lt;richard.symonds(a)wikimedia.org.uk&gt; wrote: Gordo - sadly we don't have the budget or time to upgrade to Phabricator. Given how few of us use our installation anyway, it would be a fair amount of work for not a lot of gain. Perhaps in future when there's more time available! Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents. On 16 October 2015 at 13:07, Gordon Joly &lt;gordon.joly(a)pobox.com&gt; wrote: On 15/10/15 23:53, John Mark Vandenberg wrote: I am slightly surprised that this is with Bugzilla at all. And not with Phabricator? https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Phabricator https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Phabricator/versus_Bugzilla Gordo _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk -- THOMAS MORTON Development Operations Engineer 01777861607 | thomas.morton(a)thesalegroup.co.uk THESALEGROUP.CO.UK _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk -- John Vandenberg _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk -- THOMAS MORTON Development Operations Engineer 01777861607 | thomas.morton(a)thesalegroup.co.uk THESALEGROUP.CO.UK _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk

Gordo - sadly we don't have the budget or time to upgrade to Phabricator.

I'm saying it's Friday afternoon, and you could give Richard a break. The decision whether to adopt Phabricator for WMUK is there in the Tech Committee minutes. We have our own system because we have our own devs. When last discussed, in early 2014, our devs were clear they wanted bug reports etc. routed through bugzilla. We can revisit that any time. Charles