With WLM: I was hoping that this would take place again this year, particularly since
it's been so successful in the past. Perhaps it could focus on quality photos rather
than quantity if we have reasonably comprehensive coverage of listed structures now? Or
perhaps we could think of a new topic for such a photography competition - perhaps we
could focus on statues, new buildings, ships, or something else? I guess it depends on
what else might have a standardised listing available. I'd be interested in
volunteering to help, particularly with the on-wiki infrastructure side of things, but I
definitely wouldn't be able to take a lead.
With requested photos: thanks WSC for the offer! I'd be happy to adopt the Greater
Manchester county, and to do my best to photograph the requested locations if they
don't already have available photographs.
Thanks,
Mike
On 12 Aug 2015, at 16:32, WereSpielChequers
<werespielchequers(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I have been going through the not particularly useful category Wikipedia requested
photographs in the United Kingdom
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_requested_photographs_in_the_United_Kingdom>
removing some that are done, doing a few either via commons or by importing them from the
Geograph, and most importantly moving a lot of them down to the much more useful level of
nation or in England to County.
So if you fancy taking a few photos and putting them on Wikipedia we probably have some
current requests near you!
Anyone fancy adopting a county? First couple to call for help I will go through the
requests for that county next week and pick off any I can import from the Geograph, which
should make it a bit more practical to do the rest (offer excludes London, Scotland and
Wales due to them being too big).
Regards
Jonathan
On 12 August 2015 at 10:45, Stevie Benton <stevie.benton(a)wikimedia.org.uk
<mailto:stevie.benton@wikimedia.org.uk>> wrote:
Hello Edward, everyone,
If there's a volunteer willing to take the lead on Monuments then we can offer a
little logistical support. However, the volunteers that delivered it last year said it was
an enormous amount of work and don't have the time. If you would like to lead on it
then we can help, although time is very short at this point.
Thanks and regards,
Stevie
On 12 August 2015 at 10:35, Ed Hand <edwardxx(a)gmail.com
<mailto:edwardxx@gmail.com>> wrote:
Are we taking part in Wiki Loves Monuments this year?
No mention of the UK here:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2015/Partic…
<https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2015/Participating_countries>
best wsihes
Edward
On 10 August 2015 at 16:43, WereSpielChequers <werespielchequers(a)gmail.com
<mailto:werespielchequers@gmail.com>> wrote:
I have now used the visual editor for more than a hundred edits since the speed up. I
agree that the classic editor is generally faster and I suspect that will be especially
true for anyone editing large articles as V/E's still lacks section editing.
I like the way V/E supports infobox editing, one of the things I sometimes do is add
images to articles and with the classic editor you usually have the pain of having to
check the template documentation to find out what the parameters are for image and caption
(sadly and for no obvious reason these parameters are unlikely to be "image" and
"caption"). V/E is actually quite intuitive here in allowing you to run through
the unused parameters of the infobox.
Table editing is more nuanced, on the one hand there are handy looking options that come
up inviting you to delete or add columns or rows and I'm sure at some point I will
find an opportunity to use them. But editing the contents of a cell in a table is
challenging, not a task I would suggest to a newbie and far less intuitive than using the
classic editor.
Adding images from commons is really quite impressive in V/E, I haven't yet been in
the situation of having to work out which Newcastle V/E is prompting me with and it would
be good to know whether V/E is using wiki data links, keywords, geocodes or some
combination. But however it does it the images it has prompted me with so far have been
pretty good.
Not sure between Joe and Andy's positions re showing diffs. I have had very little to
do with the education program, but I appreciate for educators knowing how to look at the
contributions of a student is important. I think that V/E would be a better entry point
for technophobes whilst clearly the classic editor is better for the technoscenti. How you
recruit one or other group for an editathon without stereotyping is an interesting
conundrum. If you have access to a large mailing list of people who might be interested
then you could do two sorts of sessions, one emphasising that this was Wikipedia editing
for anyone, especially people who tried it in the past and found it technically arcane.
Another promising a session led by a "power user" showing how to be an effective
editor on Wikipedia perhaps billed as "this session is suitable for anyone with any
programming experience, however rusty or archaic".
Alternatively if you have a good ratio of experienced editors to newbies you can guard
people and show them the editor most suitable for them.
Regards
Jonathan
On 9 Aug 2015, at 01:03, Richard Farmbrough
<richard(a)farmbrough.co.uk <mailto:richard@farmbrough.co.uk>> wrote:
I guess when it is sufficiently fast that I don't have time to hit "edit
source" instead before it loads, I will start using it on other projects. Until
then, a good character editor beats a good WIMPS editor - pity it's not a good
character editor.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org <mailto:wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l>
WMUK:
https://wikimedia.org.uk <https://wikimedia.org.uk/>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org <mailto:wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l>
WMUK:
https://wikimedia.org.uk <https://wikimedia.org.uk/>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org <mailto:wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l>
WMUK:
https://wikimedia.org.uk <https://wikimedia.org.uk/>
--
Stevie Benton
Head of External Relations
Wikimedia UK
+44 (0) 20 7065 0993 <tel:%2B44%20%280%29%2020%207065%200993> / +44 (0) 7803 505
173 <tel:%2B44%20%280%29%207803%20505%20173>
@StevieBenton
Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales,
Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor,
Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is
the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the
Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects).
Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia
nor responsibility for its contents.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org <mailto:wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l>
WMUK:
https://wikimedia.org.uk <https://wikimedia.org.uk/>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
https://wikimedia.org.uk