This story has run in several newspapers today (Thursday) and shows that Wikipedia has processes that can protect articles (which most of the public would be unaware of) and that prompt action is taken when verifiability or legal issues are outstanding. * http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/8479272/Wikipedia-users-nam… * http://www.metro.co.uk/news/862006-wikipedia-names-super-injunction-celebri… * http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1381487/Wikipedia-names-4-UK-celebr… * http://www.techdigest.tv/2011/04/superinjunction.html I would be interested to know if any other members have opinions on how well the press interest was handled by WM-UK and whether we would have been better off saying more, less or putting our case more fully on the WM-UK blog http://blog.wikimedia.org.uk ? Thanks, Fae -- http://enwp.org/user_talk:fae