e), we currently have twin goals: the advancement of heritage and
promotion of education for all. If we drop one, it's singular; as it
is, I think it reads better to regard them as plural. The Charity
Commission guidance on permissible purposes is at
[
]; the key
line here is "the advancement of the arts, culture, heritage or
science". I like mentioning heritage, but it does raise the question
of why we don't also mention the advancement of culture.
b), I agree that we decided not to mention wikis, but it seems no-one
actually changed the proposed text - would you like to?
Best
Mickey
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 8:48 PM, Tom Holden <thomas.holden(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I'm going to try to give a quick reply to the
below in my flu-addled state.
Been kind of busy this week up till now.
0=e) I'm not entirely comfortable with the introductory speal ("the
charity's objects are blah dee blah dee blah"). Firstly shouldn't it be
object singular? Secondly, can we cut the heritage gumph. There's only any
point having this sentence at all if it coincides with WMF's objectives. We
have heritage covered in what comes later (and heritage resources are by
definition also educational resources), it's not like we're going to be
buying up stately homes and preserving them. Plus wtf does "advancement of
heritage for all" mean anyway? That we're all going to be plastered in Laura
Ashley wallpaper? (OK I'm being facetious, but whatever happens that needs
rewriting.) I'm also not sure about "by means which may include all or any
of the following ". Perhaps "by means including but not limited to" would
be
better, but even this is potentially limiting as the WMF mission statement
is. If we just treated everything equally in one long list of objects
(including both the WMF mission statement and the currently numbered items)
then we'd have maximal scope.
4=a) No no no no no. We want to survive in the world possible world in which
the WMF somehow becomes evil. Or at least if something like what happened in
Spain were to happen here. (I can't remember the details now.) Thus
mentioning the WMF = dumb (and is in any case unnecessary).
b) I'm pretty sure we decided in the meeting that we didn't need to mention
wikis, hence: "freely accessible online information repositories whose
content is freely and collaboratively editable".
10=c) I think I'm tentatively with TD on this one now. I suggest though that
we leave it in for now but mark it as "subject to legal advice" (suggestion:
put those bits as italic on the page for now). And then when my friend
checks the MoA/AoA for us (potentially in parallel with the submission to
ChapCom?) we'll get a definite answer one way or another.
Tom
-----Original Message-----
From: wikimediauk-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:wikimediauk-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Mickey Conn
Sent: 08 October 2008 01:25
To: wikimediauk-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Objectives Discussion Thread
At the board meeting of 7th October, we put together a form of words
for the Objectives
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_UK_v2.0/Objectives, but have
not agreed a final version.
The new text states:
----
The charity's objects are the promotion of education and advancement
of heritage for all by empowering and engaging people to collect,
develop and effectively disseminate educational content and heritage
resources under a free license or in the public domain by means which
may include all or any of the following:
1. promoting freely accessible online information repositories
whose content is freely and collaboratively editable;
2. acting as a voice and representative for the community of UK
residents and citizens who use and edit such repositories;
3. preserving world heritage, and particularly that of the UK,
through such repositories;
4. supporting the charitable work of the Wikimedia Foundation;
5. enabling, assisting, promoting and promulgating wider
participation in the creation, dissemination and expansion of
information and educational resources covering the world's knowledge
and languages to all persons, everywhere;
6. furthering the development of electronic, printed, and other
resources required to support such participation;
7. producing, publishing and developing, or cause to be produced,
published and developed, information resources, whether in printed,
electronic, or other forms;
8. making use of or encouraging the use of information resources
for the advancement of education;
9. encouraging the adoption of practices and policies to widen
education, participation and dissemination of information worldwide;
and
10. undertaking any enterprise or business and generally do all such
other things as may be conducive to promoting the objects of the
charity.
----
The main questions raised at the board meeting were:
a) whether the text should specifically mention the Wikimedia Foundation;
b) whether the text should specifically mention wikis;
c) whether point #10 is clear, necessary and in line with charitable status;
d) whether the organisation should be a "voice and representative for
the community of UK residents and citizens", or for everyone with a
connection to the UK;
e) whether this list format is the best manner in which to describe
our objectives.
This is the starting point; the board now need the views of the
community. So please comment and make proposals, on this list, and on
meta, within the next few days.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_UK
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_UK
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l