On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Gordon Joly <gordon.joly(a)pobox.com> wrote: So is there going to be a change in ownership of qrwp.org at some point, or have those plans been scrapped? Andreas

On 2 November 2012 16:28, rexx <rexx(a)blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: However given the time so far taken there are only 3 three options: WMUK doesn't have the ability to handle domain and software back-end WMUK is incompetent The current owner doesn't actually want to transfer it. Personally I suspect the answer is 1 -- geni

That's an unfair, and unduly combative way to put it! The negotiation over these domains has taken an undue amount of time, and it is still unclear exactly why that is so. Criticism (positive) of that seems fair. But the list you suggest is hugely unfair on a number of levels. :) Tom On 2 November 2012 20:22, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:

On 02/11/12 20:37, Thomas Morton wrote: Well, yes, it would be... Gordo

I grabbed the source, Luke... svn checkout http://qrwp.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/ qrwp-read-only Gordo

On 2 November 2012 20:29, Thomas Morton <morton.thomas(a)googlemail.com> wrote: No it isn't. I can provide examples of unfair, and unduly combative way to put it if you would like Yeah you realise that's actually worse than my list right? Given the value of the property involved and the time taken if the issue is negotiations overunning then incompetence is less of viable option. If you can come up with alternative options you are free to list them. -- geni